Bad:
| a | b | c | a | b | c |
| a | b | c | a | b | c |
| a | b | c | a | b | c |
| a | b | c | a | b | c |
| a | b | c | a | b | c |
| a | b | c | a | b | c |
| a | b | c | a | b | c |
| a | b | c | a | b | c |
| a | b | c | a | b | c |
Better:
| a | b | c | a | b | c |
| a | b | c | a | b | c |
| a | b | c | a | b | c |
| a | b | c | a | b | c |
| a | b | c | a | b | c |
| a | b | c | a | b | c |
| a | b | c | a | b | c |
| a | b | c | a | b | c |
| a | b | c | a | b | c |
Edit: removed flawed analysis. It's interesting to think about this with respect to bits of information conveyed to support quickly scanning a row horizontally.
No comments:
Post a Comment